Find your water quality report

Short answer

Every community water system must give customers a yearly water quality report, the Consumer Confidence Report, by July 1. Enter your ZIP to see which systems serve it and what EPA’s PFAS testing found. For cities we cover, you get lead, PFAS, hardness and violations on one page.

ZIP lookup · nationwide

Who supplies your water?

From EPA’s UCMR 5 ZIP list. One ZIP can have several systems. Your water bill names yours.

Cities and states

125 cities in 39 states and Washington, DC, plus PFAS testing for all 50 states, listed A–Z. We don’t rank them: utilities sample in different years and at different points.

Alabama · UCMR 5: 307 systems tested

Alabama water quality

Alaska · UCMR 5: 30 systems tested

Alaska water quality by city

Anchorage
Arizona · UCMR 5: 152 systems tested

Arizona water quality by city

FlagstaffPhoenixScottsdaleTucson
Arkansas · UCMR 5: 172 systems tested

Arkansas water quality

California · UCMR 5: 707 systems tested

California water quality by city

AnaheimBerkeleyFresnoIrvineLong BeachLos AngelesMountain ViewOaklandPalm SpringsPalo AltoSacramentoSan DiegoSan FranciscoSan JoseSanta BarbaraSanta ClaraSanta CruzSanta MonicaSouth Lake TahoeSunnyvaleVentura
Colorado · UCMR 5: 165 systems tested

Colorado water quality by city

AuroraBoulderColorado SpringsDenver
Connecticut · UCMR 5: 63 systems tested

Connecticut water quality by city

New Haven
Delaware · UCMR 5: 36 systems tested

Delaware water quality

Florida · UCMR 5: 409 systems tested

Florida water quality by city

Boca RatonFort LauderdaleJacksonvilleKey WestMiamiOrlandoPensacolaTallahasseeTampa
Georgia · UCMR 5: 256 systems tested

Georgia water quality by city

AtlantaSavannah
Hawaii · UCMR 5: 45 systems tested

Hawaii water quality by city

Honolulu
Idaho · UCMR 5: 61 systems tested

Idaho water quality by city

Boise
Illinois · UCMR 5: 487 systems tested

Illinois water quality by city

Indiana · UCMR 5: 230 systems tested

Indiana water quality by city

Fort WayneIndianapolis
Iowa · UCMR 5: 152 systems tested

Iowa water quality by city

AmesDes MoinesIowa City
Kansas · UCMR 5: 103 systems tested

Kansas water quality by city

Wichita
Kentucky · UCMR 5: 231 systems tested

Kentucky water quality by city

Louisville
Louisiana · UCMR 5: 268 systems tested

Louisiana water quality by city

Baton RougeNew Orleans
Maine · UCMR 5: 41 systems tested

Maine water quality

Maryland · UCMR 5: 83 systems tested

Maryland water quality by city

Baltimore
Massachusetts · UCMR 5: 263 systems tested

Massachusetts water quality by city

Michigan · UCMR 5: 319 systems tested

Michigan water quality by city

Ann ArborDetroitFlintGrand RapidsKalamazoo
Minnesota · UCMR 5: 196 systems tested

Minnesota water quality by city

Brooklyn ParkEaganMaple GroveMinneapolisPlymouthSt. PaulWoodbury
Mississippi · UCMR 5: 239 systems tested

Mississippi water quality

Missouri · UCMR 5: 232 systems tested

Missouri water quality by city

Kansas CitySt. Louis
Montana · UCMR 5: 45 systems tested

Montana water quality

Nebraska · UCMR 5: 53 systems tested

Nebraska water quality by city

LincolnOmaha
Nevada · UCMR 5: 59 systems tested

Nevada water quality by city

Las VegasReno
New Hampshire · UCMR 5: 51 systems tested

New Hampshire water quality

New Jersey · UCMR 5: 266 systems tested

New Jersey water quality by city

Jersey CityNewark
New Mexico · UCMR 5: 73 systems tested

New Mexico water quality by city

AlbuquerqueSanta Fe
New York State · UCMR 5: 334 systems tested

New York State water quality by city

BuffaloNew YorkSyracuse
North Carolina · UCMR 5: 291 systems tested

North Carolina water quality by city

AshevilleBurlingtonCharlotteDurhamRaleighWilmington
North Dakota · UCMR 5: 38 systems tested

North Dakota water quality

Ohio · UCMR 5: 347 systems tested

Ohio water quality by city

CincinnatiClevelandColumbusToledo
Oklahoma · UCMR 5: 166 systems tested

Oklahoma water quality by city

Oklahoma CityTulsa
Oregon · UCMR 5: 127 systems tested

Oregon water quality by city

Pennsylvania · UCMR 5: 390 systems tested

Pennsylvania water quality by city

PhiladelphiaPittsburgh
Rhode Island · UCMR 5: 29 systems tested

Rhode Island water quality by city

Providence
South Carolina · UCMR 5: 165 systems tested

South Carolina water quality by city

CharlestonMyrtle Beach
South Dakota · UCMR 5: 49 systems tested

South Dakota water quality by city

Sioux Falls
Tennessee · UCMR 5: 277 systems tested

Tennessee water quality by city

KnoxvilleMemphisNashville
Texas · UCMR 5: 1,154 systems tested

Texas water quality by city

ArlingtonAustinCorpus ChristiDallasEl PasoFort WorthHoustonLaredoLubbockPasadenaPflugervilleSan Antonio
Utah · UCMR 5: 129 systems tested

Utah water quality by city

Salt Lake City
Vermont · UCMR 5: 38 systems tested

Vermont water quality

Virginia · UCMR 5: 171 systems tested

Virginia water quality by city

RichmondVirginia Beach
Washington State · UCMR 5: 248 systems tested

Washington State water quality by city

BellinghamSeattleSpokaneTacoma
West Virginia · UCMR 5: 103 systems tested

West Virginia water quality

Wisconsin · UCMR 5: 202 systems tested

Wisconsin water quality by city

MadisonMilwaukee
Wyoming · UCMR 5: 33 systems tested

Wyoming water quality

District of Columbia · UCMR 5: 3 systems tested

Washington, DC tap water

Hardness by city

Hard water leaves scale but has no federal health limit. Figures from each utility’s latest report. Cities whose report gives no hardness figure are left out.

Ann Arbor, MI
126 mg/L (7.4 gpg)
Average, hard; range 74–180 mg/L
Austin, TX
93 mg/L (5.4 gpg)
Average, moderately hard; range 70–126 mg/L
Berkeley, CA
14–160 mg/L (0.8–9.4 gpg)
Range, soft to hard
Cincinnati, OH
126–140 mg/L (7.4–8.2 gpg)
Range, hard
Columbus, OH
98–125 mg/L (5.7–7.3 gpg)
Average by source, moderately hard to hard
Corpus Christi, TX
236 mg/L (13.8 gpg)
Average, very hard
Denver, CO
105 mg/L (6.1 gpg)
Average, moderately hard; range 55–124 mg/L
Detroit, MI
107 mg/L (6.3 gpg)
Average, moderately hard; range 96–142 mg/L
Fresno, CA
129 mg/L (7.5 gpg)
Average, hard; range 87–150 mg/L
Houston, TX
135.5 mg/L (7.9 gpg)
Average, hard; range 43.5–229 mg/L
Indianapolis, IN
317 mg/L (18.5 gpg)
Average, very hard; range 148–460 mg/L
Las Vegas, NV
280 mg/L (16.4 gpg)
Average, very hard
Los Angeles, CA
103–236 mg/L (6.0–13.8 gpg)
Average by source, moderately hard to very hard
Louisville, KY
128 mg/L (7.5 gpg)
Average, hard
Memphis, TN
48 mg/L (2.8 gpg)
Average, soft; range 14–150 mg/L
New York, NY
32 mg/L (1.9 gpg)
Average, soft; range 18–100 mg/L
Oakland, CA
14–160 mg/L (0.8–9.4 gpg)
Range, soft to hard
Palm Springs, CA
30–340 mg/L (1.8–19.9 gpg)
Average by source, soft to very hard
Portland, OR
7–80 mg/L (0.4–4.7 gpg)
Range, soft to moderately hard
Sacramento, CA
83 mg/L (4.9 gpg)
Average, moderately hard; range 15–154 mg/L
Salt Lake City, UT
136–571 mg/L (8.0–33.4 gpg)
Range, hard to very hard
San Diego, CA
145–243 mg/L (8.5–14.2 gpg)
Average by source, hard to very hard
San Francisco, CA
62 mg/L (3.6 gpg)
Average, moderately hard; range 8.1–112 mg/L
San Jose, CA
99–288 mg/L (5.8–16.8 gpg)
Average by source, moderately hard to very hard
Santa Barbara, CA
44–464 mg/L (2.6–27.1 gpg)
Average by source, soft to very hard
Tampa, FL
211 mg/L (12.3 gpg)
Average, very hard
Washington, DC
139 mg/L (8.1 gpg)
Average, hard; range 84–194 mg/L

Classes: USGS (0–60 mg/L soft, 61–120 moderately hard, 121–180 hard, above 180 very hard).

How to read a water quality report

The terms below are the ones these reports use. What the numbers mean for your glass, and what to check at your own tap, is in is tap water safe to drink.

MCL
Maximum contaminant level: the legal limit a utility must meet.
MCLG
Goal: the level with no known health risk. Not enforceable. For lead, arsenic and PFOA/PFOS it is zero.
Action level
For lead and copper: if more than 10% of sampled homes exceed it, the utility must act. Lead: 15 ppb, 10 ppb from Nov 1, 2027.
90th percentile
9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below this number.
MRDL
Limit for disinfectants such as chlorine and chloramine: 4.0 mg/L.
Health reference level
EPA screening value for unregulated contaminants. Not a legal limit.
ppb · ppt
Parts per billion (µg/L) and parts per trillion (ng/L).

Sources: EPA drinking water regulations, Lead and Copper Rule Improvements, EPA Consumer Confidence Reports.