Is tap water safe to drink?

Short answer

Is tap water safe to drink in the US? For about 9 in 10 people, it comes from a public system that must meet EPA limits for more than 90 contaminants and must tell you when it doesn't. The weak spots are lead from old pipes, private wells nobody tests for you, and PFAS limits that start in 2029.

Is tap water safe to drink in the US?

Get tap water from a public system 9 in 10 CDC
Contaminants with EPA rules 90+ EPA
Deadline to warn you of an urgent problem 24 hours EPA Tier 1 notice
Private wells over a health benchmark 1 in 5 USGS, via EPA

The question “is tap water safe to drink” has a legal answer and a practical one. The legal one: CDC says 9 in 10 people in the US get their tap water from a public water system, and that system must meet EPA standards. EPA has drinking water regulations for more than 90 contaminants, from bacteria and nitrate to lead, arsenic and disinfection byproducts. EPA's WaterSense program calls the public supply “some of the safest in the world.”

The practical answer has more layers. What the utility sends is sampled on a schedule and published in a yearly report. What your own pipes add is mostly lead, which enters between the street main and your faucet, so two houses on one system can get different water. And about 43 million people on private wells sit outside these rules altogether.

When something goes wrong at the plant, the rules put the burden on the utility. Per EPA’s public notification rule, a problem that could affect health right away must be announced within 24 hours. A violation without immediate risk gets a notice within 30 days, and minor ones can wait for the annual report.

What the data shows for 125 large US cities

We built a page for each of 125 large cities from EPA's federal records and the utility's own report. Together their main systems serve about 80.4 million people. Here is the short version of each, largest system first.

Sources: EPA SDWIS (lead, violations, data to Oct 2026), EPA UCMR 5 (PFAS, samples 2023–2025), utility water quality reports. Lead is the 90th percentile of home taps in the latest round. Click a city for dates, limits and every reading.
CityLead, 90th percentilePFOA or PFOS, highest sampleHealth-based violations, 10 years
New York, NY10 ppbNot detected1, latest Feb 2017
Los Angeles, CA3.9 ppbNot detected1, latest Jan 2018
Houston, TX5 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 4 other PFAS1, latest May 2025
Chicago, IL6.4 ppbNot detectedNone listed
San Antonio, TX1.6 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 3 other PFASNone listed
Miami, FL3.1 ppbPFOS up to 33 pptNone listed
Phoenix, AZ2.7 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 2 other PFAS1, latest Jan 2021
Philadelphia, PA2 ppbPFOA up to 8.1 pptNone listed
Baltimore, MD2.7 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 1 other PFAS3, latest Apr 2026
Las Vegas, NV2.1 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 2 other PFASNone listed
Oakland, CA0 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 2 other PFASNone listed
Berkeley, CA0 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 2 other PFASNone listed
San Diego, CA0 ppbNot detectedNone listed
Dallas, TX1.1 ppbPFOA up to 6.3 pptNone listed
Columbus, OH1.2 ppbPFOA up to 5.3 pptNone listed
Cleveland, OH0 ppbNot detectedNone listed
Denver, CO3.6 ppbNot detectedNone listed
Charlotte, NC0 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 2 other PFASNone listed
Seattle, WA1.6 ppbNot detectedNone listed
Austin, TX0 ppbPFOS up to 4.8 ppt5, latest Feb 2022
Atlanta, GA1.4 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 4 other PFAS5, latest Apr 2019
San Jose, CA0 ppbPFOS up to 6.2 ppt1, latest Jun 2023
Fort Worth, TX3 ppbPFOA up to 8.3 ppt1, latest Mar 2021
Indianapolis, IN3.4 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 4 other PFASNone listed
San Francisco, CA4.9 ppbNot detectedNone listed
Jacksonville, FL1.5 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 2 other PFASNone listed
Louisville, KY1.1 ppbPFOA up to 7.5 pptNone listed
Cincinnati, OH2.1 ppbPFOS up to 6.1 pptNone listed
Nashville, TN0.8 ppbNot detectedNone listed
El Paso, TX0 ppbPFOS up to 8.5 pptNone listed
Tampa, FL1.5 ppbPFOS up to 6.9 pptNone listed
Tucson, AZ0.6 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 1 other PFASNone listed
Boston, MA5.8 ppbNot detected1, latest Nov 2020
Portland, OR5 ppbNot detected1, latest Dec 2017
Omaha, NE12.3 ppbNot detectedNone listed
Memphis, TN4.7 ppbNot detectedNone listed
Raleigh, NC0 ppbPFOS up to 5.6 pptNone listed
Oklahoma City, OK0 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 1 other PFASNone listed
Detroit, MI7.5 ppbNot detectedNone listed
Washington, DC2 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 2 other PFASNone listed
Honolulu, HI0 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 1 other PFASNone listed
Milwaukee, WI5.3 ppbNot detectedNone listed
Baton Rouge, LA1 ppbNot detectedNone listed
Albuquerque, NM0 ppbNot detectedNone listed
Kansas City, MO2.1 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 1 other PFAS1, latest Mar 2019
Fresno, CA0 ppbPFOS up to 30 pptNone listed
Orlando, FL2 ppbNot detected1, latest Jul 2019
Aurora, CO4.7 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 4 other PFASNone listed
Sacramento, CA0 ppbPFOS up to 41.4 pptNone listed
Pittsburgh, PA2 ppbNot detected2, latest Jul 2018
Long Beach, CA1 ppbNot detectedNone listed
Colorado Springs, CO5.7 ppbNot detectedNone listed
Irvine, CA0 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 2 other PFASNone listed
Tacoma, WA0 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 2 other PFASNone listed
Reno, NV0 ppbPFOS up to 20 pptNone listed
Virginia Beach, VA0 ppbNot detectedNone listed
Minneapolis, MN2 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 1 other PFASNone listed
New Haven, CT0 ppbPFOS up to 10.7 pptNone listed
Arlington, TX1.2 ppbPFOS up to 4.6 pptNone listed
Tulsa, OK1.5 ppbNot detectedNone listed
Wichita, KS1.4 ppbNot detectedNone listed
St. Paul, MN10 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 2 other PFAS1, latest Apr 2022
Salt Lake City, UT2.5 ppbPFOS up to 7.1 ppt1, latest Sep 2017
Toledo, OH0 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 1 other PFAS1, latest Mar 2023
Anaheim, CA0 ppbPFOS up to 29 pptNone listed
Spokane, WA2 ppbPFOS up to 6.1 pptNone listed
New Orleans, LA6 ppbPFOS up to 4.2 ppt1, latest Jan 2025
Durham, NC0 ppbPFOS up to 5.8 pptNone listed
Providence, RI1.7 ppbNot detected1, latest Jul 2018
Corpus Christi, TX1.4 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 3 other PFAS2, latest Feb 2021
Grand Rapids, MI7 ppbNot detectedNone listed
St. Louis, MO1.8 ppbNot detectedNone listed
Lincoln, NE4.5 ppbNot detectedNone listed
Newark, NJ4 ppbPFOA up to 5.3 ppt16, latest Jul 2022
Charleston, SC3.5 ppbPFOS up to 6.5 ppt2, latest Jul 2025
Buffalo, NY3 ppbNot detectedNone listed
Madison, WI1.8 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 2 other PFAS1, latest Oct 2024
Fort Wayne, IN2.6 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 2 other PFAS1, latest Jan 2022
Lubbock, TX1.4 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 1 other PFASNone listed
Boise, ID2 ppbNot detectedNone listed
Jersey City, NJ7.8 ppbPFOA up to 9.2 ppt1, latest Aug 2020
Laredo, TX1.4 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 1 other PFAS4, latest May 2026
Knoxville, TN0.6 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 1 other PFASNone listed
Des Moines, IA0 ppbNot detected1, latest May 2017
Pensacola, FL0.6 ppbPFOS up to 35.7 pptNone listed
Scottsdale, AZ2.3 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 1 other PFASNone listed
Richmond, VA3.6 ppbNot detected1, latest Jul 2020
Anchorage, AK0 ppbPFOA up to 9.1 pptNone listed
Sioux Falls, SD3 ppbNot detectedNone listed
Wilmington, NC0 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 1 other PFASNone listed
Tallahassee, FL1.4 ppbPFOS up to 7.9 pptNone listed
Kalamazoo, MI4 ppbPFOS up to 6.7 ppt4, latest Jul 2019
Syracuse, NY12 ppbNot detected16, latest Mar 2025
Fort Lauderdale, FL4.9 ppbPFOS up to 16 pptNone listed
Savannah, GA3.9 ppbNot detectedNone listed
Boulder, CO2 ppbNot detected2, latest Jul 2017
Sunnyvale, CA0 ppbNot detectedNone listed
Asheville, NC0 ppbNot detected2, latest Oct 2024
Pasadena, TX3.7 ppbPFOS up to 4.9 pptNone listed
Bellingham, WA3.4 ppbNot detectedNone listed
Santa Clara, CA2.7 ppbNot detectedNone listed
Boca Raton, FL0.6 ppbPFOS up to 7.1 ppt1, latest Aug 2019
Ann Arbor, MI2.3 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 3 other PFASNone listed
Ventura, CA0 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 2 other PFAS1, latest Jul 2018
Santa Cruz, CA0 ppbNot detectedNone listed
Santa Barbara, CA2.5 ppbNot detectedNone listed
Santa Fe, NM1.1 ppbNot detected1, latest Oct 2024
Santa Monica, CA1.4 ppbPFOA up to 4.6 pptNone listed
Brooklyn Park, MN1 ppbPFOA up to 10.5 pptNone listed
Key West, FL4 ppbPFOS up to 50.3 pptNone listed
Woodbury, MN3 ppbPFOA up to 17.1 pptNone listed
Maple Grove, MN2 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 1 other PFASNone listed
Mountain View, CA0 ppbNot detectedNone listed
Flint, MI3 ppbNot detected1, latest Oct 2024
Flagstaff, AZ3.6 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 1 other PFASNone listed
Plymouth, MN2 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 1 other PFASNone listed
Palm Springs, CA0 ppbNot detectedNone listed
Iowa City, IA4 ppbNot detectedNone listed
Eagan, MN0 ppbNo PFOA/PFOS; 1 other PFASNone listed
Palo Alto, CA0 ppbNot detectedNone listed
Pflugerville, TX1.1 ppbPFOS up to 14.4 ppt14, latest Jul 2025
Burlington, NC0 ppbPFOS up to 17 ppt1, latest Jul 2021
Ames, IA0 ppbNot detectedNone listed
Myrtle Beach, SC0.7 ppbPFOA up to 5.3 pptNone listed
South Lake Tahoe, CA0 ppbPFOA up to 6.1 pptNone listed

Three things stand out. None of the 125 systems is above the 15 ppb lead action level. The highest is Omaha at 12.3 ppb. In 40 of 125, at least one sample of PFOA or PFOS reached 4 ppt, the level of the coming federal limit. And 38 had at least one health-based violation in the last 10 years, 25 of them only for “treatment technique,” meaning a required treatment step was missed or late rather than a measured level going over a limit.

Nationally, EPA's UCMR 5 program sampled 10,313 public systems for 29 PFAS between 2023 and 2025. Of those, 3,595 (35%) found at least one PFAS, and 1,739 (17%) had a PFOA or PFOS sample at 4 ppt or more.

Not on the list?

Look up the water system for your ZIP

Shows the public systems EPA links to your ZIP, their PFAS result, and our city page when we have one.

We don't label a city safe or unsafe. Each page puts the reading next to its legal limit and the date, and says which source it came from.

Lead comes from pipes, not from the treatment plant

Lead is the main reason a city can meet every limit and one kitchen tap still has a problem. EPA says lead service lines are usually the biggest source, and that homes built before 1986 are more likely to have lead pipes, solder or fixtures. Without a lead line, brass faucets and old solder can still add some. EPA and CDC both say there is no known safe level of lead in a child's blood.

The Lead and Copper Rule Improvements, finalized in October 2024, require water systems to find and replace lead pipes within 10 years, test more often and act at a lower lead level. Until your street is done, EPA's own advice is practical:

  • Use only cold water for drinking, cooking and baby formula. Boiling does not reduce lead.
  • Run the tap, take a shower or run a load of laundry before drinking. The longer water sits in the pipes, the more lead it may hold.
  • Clean the faucet aerator, where lead particles can collect.
  • Ask your utility whether the pipe from the main to your house is lead. If it doesn't know, a licensed plumber can check.

The utility's lead number describes its sampling sites, not your faucet. To know your own, test your tap for lead.

A filter is the other option EPA lists. Pick one whose NSF or WQA listing names lead, such as a certified pitcher or under-sink filter, and follow its cartridge schedule. A listing shows the filter reduced lead in a lab test, not that your water ends up with none.

Not necessarily in your water. Check your utility report or a tap test before you buy for lead.

Private wells: nobody tests the water for you

EPA puts it bluntly: private well owners are responsible for the safety of their own water. Wells are not regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act, and most states don't regulate them either. That covers about 15% of the US population, over 43 million people.

The same EPA page cites a USGS study of about 2,100 private wells: roughly one in five had at least one contaminant above a level of concern for human health. CDC lists animal waste, septic systems, flooded sewers and fertilizer as common sources of nitrate in wells.

CDC asks every well owner to test at least once a year for:

  • total coliform bacteria, a sign that germs can get in,
  • nitrates, which are most dangerous for babies,
  • total dissolved solids and pH, which affect taste and pipe corrosion.

CDC recommends a state-certified lab, and your health department can say whether to add lead, arsenic, radium or pesticides. Test again if there's flooding near the well, after any repair, or when the taste, color or smell changes. If a result shows germs or chemicals, CDC suggests bottled water or another source in the meantime.

Mail-in lab kits and strips are compared in home test kits. Which tests a well needs, when to repeat them and what to do with a result over the limit: how to test a private well.

PFAS: the newest limits start in 2029

PFAS are a large family of long-lasting man-made chemicals. On April 10, 2024 EPA set the first national limits: 4.0 ppt each for PFOA and PFOS, with a health goal of zero. Public systems have until 2029 to comply. On May 18, 2026 EPA proposed keeping both limits, letting systems ask for two more years, to 2031, and dropping the separate limits for PFHxS, PFNA, HFPO-DA and a mixture of PFAS.

That timeline matters when you read the numbers above. The UCMR 5 samples were taken before the limits apply, so a 2024 sample over 4 ppt is not a violation. Compliance will be judged on a running annual average, not one test. It does tell you which systems have work to do, and the city pages show each system's PFOA and PFOS result next to the 4.0 ppt line.

If your system reports PFOA or PFOS, the home option is a filter whose listing names those two chemicals. Some pitchers, under-sink filters and reverse osmosis systems carry it. Boiling won't help, since CDC says it doesn't take chemicals out of water.

Not necessarily in your water. About 65% of systems in UCMR 5 found none of the 29 PFAS it looked for.

Germs, boil-water notices and short-term problems

CDC estimates at least 1.1 million people in the US get sick each year from germs in drinking water, about 1 in 300. Legionella is the most common cause of outbreaks. It grows in building water systems such as faucets and water heaters, and most outbreaks are in hotels, hospitals and care homes with large plumbing.

Treatment plants disinfect water with chlorine, chloramine or chlorine dioxide and leave a small amount in the pipes on purpose, so it keeps working on the way to your house. After a hurricane, a flood or a broken main, EPA notes that local officials may tell you to use only bottled, boiled or disinfected water.

When one comes, CDC’s advice is simple: boiling is the best way to kill germs in water. Bring it to a rolling boil for 1 minute, or 3 minutes above 6,500 feet, and keep doing it until the notice is lifted.

Why tap water can taste bad and still meet the limits

Bad taste and smell are usually about looks and comfort, not health. Of the 125 cities we track, 19 use chloramine and the rest chlorine as the disinfectant that stays in the pipes.

Minerals do the rest. CDC explains that EPA's secondary standards cover 15 chemicals, such as iron, manganese, sulfate and chloride, that affect taste, color or smell rather than health. Utilities are not required to meet them. EPA warns that “odor-free water is not necessarily safe to drink,” and bad taste can push “a great number of people” away from their public supply. Total dissolved solids, the number on cheap TDS meters, is one of those 15. It measures how much is dissolved, not whether any of it is harmful.

If taste is the only issue, a carbon filter listed under NSF/ANSI 42 for chlorine reduces the taste and odor. For chloramine, look for chloramine named in the listing, since not every carbon filter covers it.

Not necessarily in your water. Your utility report says which disinfectant your system uses.

How to check your own tap water

Most of the answer costs nothing.

  1. Read your utility's annual report. EPA requires community water systems to send it by July 1 each year. It lists every regulated contaminant found, the level and the limit. EPA’s local water page shows how to find yours.
  2. Look up your system on our water quality pages, which show EPA's lead, PFAS and violation records with dates.
  3. Ask whether your service line is lead. If it is, or nobody knows, test the tap itself, especially with a baby in the house.
  4. On a well, send a sample to a state-certified lab every year.
  5. If a report or test shows something above a limit, choose a filter whose listing names that contaminant. CDC notes that if your water is already free of harmful germs and chemicals, you may not need one.

None of this replaces advice from your doctor or your local health department, especially during pregnancy or for a baby's formula. See our health disclaimer for how we use these sources.

Questions people ask

Can you drink all tap water in the USA?

Not all of it without checking. Water from public systems, which serve about 9 in 10 people, must meet EPA limits, and the utility must warn you when it doesn't. Private wells aren't regulated, homes with lead service lines can have more lead than the system average, and any town can be under a temporary boil-water notice. Look up your city or ZIP for your system's record.

Why do some people refuse to drink tap water?

Often it's taste and smell from chlorine, chloramine or minerals. EPA's standards for those cover taste, not health. Trust is the other part, and many still point to Flint, where the latest lead result is 3 ppb at the 90th percentile of home taps.

Is bottled water safer than tap water?

Not by default. Bottled water is regulated by the FDA, which adopts EPA’s tap water standards for it or decides they aren't needed. One difference FDA points out is lead: 5 ppb for bottled water against the 15 ppb action level for public systems, because bottled water doesn't travel through lead pipes.

Does boiling tap water make it safe to drink?

Boiling kills germs, which is why CDC uses it for boil-water notices: 1 minute at a rolling boil, 3 minutes above 6,500 feet. It doesn't reduce lead, nitrate or PFAS, and CDC says boiling won't take chemicals out of water. For those, see lead and PFAS above.

Ready to pick one?

I compare 14 pitchers on certification, yearly cartridge cost, warranty and owner reviews. These score highest right now.

See all 14 pitchers Prices checked Oct 13 to Oct 15, 2026 ·

Affiliate links